|
|
www.fotografie.fr-Test |
|
Sharpness comparison between consumer lenses vs "pro" and/or primes on the Nikon D3 |
|
After several tests and with my first 35mm sensor DSRL experience
-Canon 5D-, I learned that bigger sensors (with larger pixels) are much more forgiving
with prosumer or even mediocre quality lenses than DX cameras with little pixels
and high pixel density. A little bit
logical if you imagine how precise a lens has to be made to transfer light rays
to a tiny little sensor with 10 million or more photosites on it... As I like to have a walk-around lens on my camera that covers a nice focal range I purchased the Nikkor 28-105 3.5-4.5 and the Nikkor 24-120VR and did a sharpness comparison test against expensive pro lenses and some primes. The test is basically made for my own use and helps me to decide what lens I want to keep for common use on my D3 and also not to let me influence anymore by sometimes extreme different opinions from other users on photographic gear website's forums. So called "lens flaws" reported by amateur users are more than often users mistakes... This test has been done on tripod, all in 3 different
apertures and @ 3 focal lenghts: 28mm, 50mm and 105mm. The camera was set to
"normal" sharpness in the in-camera settings , all shot in JPEG, and
exposure delay mode "on". None of this images have been postprocessed
for sharpness or whatever, only resized for website publication. Colours and
saturation could be pushed in PP as well, but I wanted to have
"neutral" pictures.
|
@ 28mm
the original scene:
![]() |
crops @F3.5 |
||||
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Nikkor 17-35 F2.8 |
Nikkor 28-105 F.5-4.5 |
Nikkor 24-120 VR |
||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
Nikkor 17-35 F2.8 |
Nikkor 28-105 F.5-4.5 |
Nikkor 24-120 VR |
||
crops @F11 |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
| Nikkor 17-35 F2.8 | Nikkor 28-105 F.5-4.5 | Nikkor 24-120 VR | ||
@ 50mm
the original scene:
|
|
crops @F3.5 |
|
![]() |
|
| Nikkor 50mm F1.8 prime | |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nikkor 28-105 F.5-4.5 | Nikkor 24-120 VR |
crops @F7.1 |
|
![]() |
|
| Nikkor 50mm F1.8 prime | |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nikkor 28-105 F.5-4.5 | Nikkor 24-120 VR |
crops @F11 |
|
![]() |
|
| Nikkor 50mm F1.8 prime | |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nikkor 28-105 F.5-4.5 | Nikkor 24-120 VR |
@ 105mm
the original scene:
|
|
crops @F3.5 |
|
![]() |
|
| Nikkor 105VR | |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nikkor 28-105 F.5-4.5 | Nikkor 24-120 VR |
crops @F7.1 |
|
![]() |
|
| Nikkor 105VR | |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nikkor 28-105 F.5-4.5 | Nikkor 24-120 VR |
crops @F11 |
|
![]() |
|
| Nikkor 105VR | |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nikkor 28-105 F.5-4.5 | Nikkor 24-120 VR |
My conclusion: Mounted on the D3 all in equal conditions, the Nikkor 28-105 F3.5-4.5 and the Nikkor 24-120VR are pretty equal about sharpness and overall image quality. The 24-120VR has the clear advantage in focal lenght, focusing speed and has VR. The only advantage the 28-105 has over the 24-120VR is the closer focus ability (1:2). The price difference between both lenses is covered by more possibilities. At the other hand the primes give much more sharpness than zooms, a fact where nobody will be amazed about, but modern zooms aren't "blown away" if you take only sharpness in consideration. In the original pictures eventhough(full size) the difference in sharpness between the primes and the zooms is more visible. I did approx the same test with the same lenses on my D200, and there the difference between expensive lenses and primes was bigger than it is on the D3, which proves once more that bigger sensors with lower pixel density and larger sensors are more forgiving about lens quality as DX format sensors with high pixel density. Thanks for your attention and thanks for visiting my humble website. Stany Buyle.
|